Drawing for FLIP FLASHER

USPTO serial 85349106

FLIP FLASHER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLIP FLASHER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Suzann Moskowitz

Suzann Moskowitz The Moskowitz Firm LLC24870 Fairmount BlvdBeachwood, OH 44122UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Lights for bicycles and lights for vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 2, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 16, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 16, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 16, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 29, 2013EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 10, 2013GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Mar 10, 2013GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Mar 10, 2013CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Feb 12, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2013AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 11, 2013PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 10, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 10, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 10, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 11, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 10, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 30, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 20, 2011WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Oct 20, 2011WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance