USPTO serial 85350394
KRASH!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KRASH!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. Seiter
William J. Seiter Seiter Legal Studio2500 Broadway, Bldg F, Suite F-125Santa Monica, CA 90404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, t-shirts, shirts, tank tops, sweat shirts, sweat pants, sweat suits, jeans, pants, shorts, fleece shorts, overalls, jumpsuits, skirts, dresses, blouses, jackets, sweaters, fleece pullovers, vests, fleece vests, swimwear, bathing suits, beach cover-ups, sleepwear, pajamas, robes, nightgowns, leotards, lingerie, panties, bras, boxer shorts, underwear, scarves, belts, socks, stockings, tights, leggings, gloves; outerwear, namely, coats and raincoats; headgear, namely, hats, caps, headbands, visors and bandanas; footwear, namely, shoes, slippers, boots, sandals, flip-flops, and athletic shoes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |