USPTO serial 85350513
XFREEFALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XFREEFALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay F. Moldovanyi
JAY F. MOLDOVANYI FAY SHARPE LLP1228 EUCLID AVE FL 5CLEVELAND, OH 44115-1834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software and downloadable computer software, embedded software, and firmware for use in data compression, data management, storing, decompression and playback for digital video and audio; computer hardware and software for use in communicating with video transmission units compressing and decompressing, displaying, storing and logging images in the field of television and live performances and communication interfaces, namely, media storage devices for use with desk top media players, embedded media players, namely, CD and DVD players, televisions, digital video recorders, Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) and wireless devices, namely, cell phones, smart phones and PDA's; Set Top Box's (STB's); enterprise solutions, namely, integrated software solutions, namely, integrated software solutions for use in data compression, data management, storing, decompression and playback for digital, video and audio utilized by all departments within an organization | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |