USPTO serial 85353315
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Morganville, NJ
Morganville, NJ
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Harrison
MARK HARRISON VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-4385UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | toys, namely, dolls, toy figures, toy vehicles, flying disks, water guns, playground balls, sports balls, balls for games, pogo sticks, yo-yos, kites, wind spinners, snow globes, toy figures, plastic figures, plastic and bendable disks, play slime, chemistry sets, toy putty, sticky figures, activity games in the nature of target games and action skill games, pop up toys, squishy balls, manipulative puzzles, board games, 3-d activity sets in the nature of children's multiple toy 3-d activity sets, toy watches, toy jewelry, balloons, streamers, paper party hats, and beach balls | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | ISTB | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE-TTAB REQUEST | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 29, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 15, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |