Drawing for BLOOD RED DRAGON

USPTO serial 85353668

BLOOD RED DRAGON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAWE III, WILLIAM H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLOOD RED DRAGON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles C. Rainey

Charles C. Rainey Hamrick & Evans LLP2600 W Olive AveSuite 1020Burbank, CA 91505

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Visual recordings and audio-visual recordings in the field of entertainment and music; cases for holding compact discs, DVDs, and other electronic media; computer storage devices, namely, blank flash drives; decorative charms for cell phones; decorative magnets; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of comic books and magazines, journals, brochures, pamphlets and newsletters, all in the field of music and subject matters generally related to entertainment; digital music downloadable from the Internet; downloadable video recordings featuring television programs and music; headphones and earphones; mouse pads; musical sound recordings; musical video recordings; protective covers, cases and skin coverings for cell phones, personal digital assistants (PDA), portable media players, cameras, and laptop or tablet computers; and telephonesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 30, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 23, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 6, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 6, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 2, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 17, 2012ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Aug 1, 2012CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2012APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jul 25, 2012EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 27, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 23, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 23, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 22, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 7, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 17, 2011PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2011PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance