Drawing for UTLNOVELAS

USPTO serial 85354705

UTLNOVELAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4422345Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 22, 2013
Examiner
SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UTLNOVELAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JORGE ARCINIEGA

JORGE ARCINIEGA Loeb & Loeb LLP10100 Santa Monica Blvd. Suite 2200Los Angeles, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Television broadcasting; cable television broadcasting; satellite television broadcasting; subscription television broadcasting; video-on-demand transmission services; pay-per-view television transmission services; broadcasting programs via a global computer network; simulcasting broadcast television over global communication networks, the Internet and wireless networks; Interactive delivery of video over digital networks; video transmission over digital networks; radio broadcasting; cable radio broadcasting; transmission of radio programs by satellite; internet radio broadcasting services; mobile radio broadcasting; Internet broadcasting services; broadcasting of video and audio programming over the Internet; podcasting services; mobile media services in the nature of electronic transmission of entertainment media contentSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDMar 1, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2014C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Jul 23, 2014C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jul 22, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 15, 2014ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 20, 2013SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2013REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 19, 2013CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Aug 29, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2013CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2013SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 2, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 2, 2013IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 2, 2013INCSITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE—
Jun 28, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 5, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 5, 2013IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 5, 2013EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jun 5, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 14, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 6, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 6, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 8, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 6, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 6, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 11, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 7, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 6, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 6, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 3, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jun 29, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance