USPTO serial 85355496
CORSENTIAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WIENER, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CORSENTIAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
TORONTO ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth D. Suzan
KENNETH D. SUZAN HODGSON RUSS LLP140 PEARL ST STE 100BUFFALO, NY 14202-4040UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Designing and conducting market surveys, performance management and performance measurement studies, market impact studies, customer satisfaction surveys, and market research for others; Analyzing, interpreting and advising others regarding data from market surveys, performance management and performance measurement studies, market impact studies, customer satisfaction surveys, and market research; Data collection services; Data processing services; Consulting services, namely in the fields of market surveys, market impact studies, customer satisfaction surveys, market research, strategic planning, technology planning, technology implementation services, customer experience design, performance management, performance measurement; Educational services, namely, lectures, seminars and workshops in the fields of market surveys, market impact studies, customer satisfaction surveys, market research, strategic planning, technology planning, technology implementation services, customer experience design, performance management, performance measurement; Information services, namely the provision of publications in print and transmitted electronically, in the fields of market surveys, market impact studies, customer satisfaction surveys, market research, strategic planning, technology planning, technology implementation services, customer experience design, performance management, performance measurement; Providing design, development, delivery and implementation of Internet web sites and portals in the field of market surveys, market impact studies, customer satisfaction surveys, market research, performance management, and performance measurement; Providing collection, sorting, customization and access via the Internet to digital survey data and analysis and interpretation thereof | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 26, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |