Drawing for TRAVELERS POLO AND RACQUET CLUB

USPTO serial 85357462

TRAVELERS POLO AND RACQUET CLUB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRAVELERS POLO AND RACQUET CLUB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R. Joseph Trojan

R. JOSEPH TROJAN TROJAN LAW OFFICES9250 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 325BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212-3376UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Men and women's clothing, namely, shirts, blouses, sweatshirts, sweaters, pants, skirts, shorts, dresses, suits, jackets, coats, shell jackets, underwear, gloves, and beltsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 8, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 3, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 3, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 9, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 25, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 25, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 20, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 11, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 11, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 24, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 5, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 5, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 29, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 27, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 1, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 19, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 5, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 16, 2012ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jul 10, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 13, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 31, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 11, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 11, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 11, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 11, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 11, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 20, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 2, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance