USPTO serial 85357607
SPEECHFX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, AMY C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPEECHFX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Colby C. Nuttall
COLBY C. NUTTALL Durham Jones & Pinegar, P.C.111 East Broadway, Ste. 900Intellectual Property Law GroupSalt Lake City, UT 84111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software for speech recognition and voice command; computer hardware and software for automated speech recognition and voice command; computer hardware and software for converting text to electronically delivered audible speech; computer hardware and software for evaluating speech; computer hardware and software for evaluating speech quality; computer hardware and software for evaluating diction; computer hardware and software for providing feedback; computer hardware and software for providing a graphical response to analyzed speech and/or diction; computer hardware and software for speech enabled interfaces with electronic devices; computer hardware and software for speech enabled gaming interfaces; computer hardware and software for speech enabled computer video games; computer hardware and software for speech enabled console video games; computer hardware and software for speech enabled automotive interfaces; computer hardware and software for speech enabled navigational interfaces; computer hardware and software for speech enabled in-vehicle navigational interfaces; computer hardware and software for speech enabled hand-held navigational interfaces; computer hardware and software for speech enabled GPS interfaces; computer hardware and software for speech enabled dictionary interfaces; computer hardware and software for speech interface development tools; computer hardware and software for speech enabled mobile devices; computer hardware and software for speech enabled wireless mobile devices; computer hardware and software for speech enabled computer telephony services; computer hardware and software for speech enabled servers; computer hardware and software for speech enabled software applications; computer hardware and software for speech enabled computer applications; computer hardware and software for speech enabled desktop computer applications; computer hardware and software for speech enabled personal electronic device applications; computer hardware and software for speech enabled voice server interfaces; computer hardware and software for speech engine software; computer hardware and software for speech enabled embedded processors; computer hardware and software for speech enabled automotive interfaces; computer hardware and software for speech enabled appliance interfaces; computer hardware and software for speech enabled desktop computer applications; speech recognition services; voice command services; services for converting text to electronically delivered audible speech; providing speech recognition software; providing voice command software; providing software for converting text to electronically delivered audible speech; providing telecommunication services utilizing speech recognition; providing telecommunication services utilizing voice command; providing telecommunication services utilizing conversion of text to electronically delivered audible speech | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |