USPTO serial 85357616
CHOC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARADEWELAI, BENJI YUEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHOC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KENNETH L. MITCHELL
KENNETH L MITCHELL WOODLING KROST AND RUST9213 CHILLICOTHE RDKIRTLAND, OH 44094-8500UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Candy; chocolate bars; chocolate candies; chocolate covered pretzels; chocolate covered cashews; chocolate covered potato chips; chocolate covered almond clusters; chocolate covered grapes; milk chocolate caramel cream candy; milk chocolate caramel cream candy; dark chocolate caramel cream candy; milk chocolate covered pecan- caramel-marshmallow candy; and, chocolate covered almonds-toffee; (Based on Intent to Use) chocolate covered nutty brittle | ACTIVE | Mar 31, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 9, 2014 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 30, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 30, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 21, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |