Drawing for CORSENTIAL CLOSED-LOOP CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE

USPTO serial 85357960

CORSENTIAL CLOSED-LOOP CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WIENER, MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORSENTIAL CLOSED-LOOP CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth D. Suzan

KENNETH D. SUZAN HODGSON RUSS LLP140 PEARL ST STE 100BUFFALO, NY 14202-4040UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Designing and conducting market surveys; designing and conducting studies to measure business management performance in the field of customer experience management; designing and conducting market impact studies in the field of customer experience management; designing and conducting customer satisfaction surveys; conducting market research, namely, surveys and data collection for others; analyzing, interpreting and advising others concerning market survey data; analyzing, interpreting and advising data from studies measuring the performance of business management, business market impact research studies, customer satisfaction surveys, and market research; data collection services in the fields of advertising, marketing, public opinion, and customer experience management; data processing services; consulting services, namely, conducting and analyzing business market research surveys, business market impact research studies, customer satisfaction surveys, market research studies, and business strategic planning studies; business strategic planning services in the fields of the technology industry, customer experience design, business performance management, and business performance measurementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 1, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 28, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 3, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 13, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 30, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 24, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 3, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 3, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 25, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 16, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 10, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 6, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jul 5, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance