USPTO serial 85358283
TOTAL LUBRICATION MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JANICE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOTAL LUBRICATION MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel N. Daisak
DANIEL DAISAK KACVINSKY DAISAK BLUNI PLLC3120 PRINCETON PIKESUITE 303LAWRENCEVILLE, NJ 08648Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing business management and consultation, business advice and information for industrial processing facilities having equipment requiring lubrication systems; providing independent ratings and reviews of other businesses for commercial purposes; conducting business audits in the field of industrial processing facilities; auditing, namely, account auditing and business auditing for industrial processing facilities having equipment requiring lubrication systems | ABANDONED | — |
| 036 | Providing financial analysis, financial advice, financial consultation and financial information for industrial processing facilities having equipment requiring lubrication systems | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | Installation and maintenance of lubrication systems for industrial processing facilities | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Design and development of lubrication systems for industrial processing facilities | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lubrication Systems Company of Texas, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Lubrication Systems Company of Texas, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TOTAL LUBRICATION MANAGEMENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 29, 2012 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 15, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |