USPTO serial 85358495
HP QUINTA DE S.VICENTE AZEITE VIRGEM EXTRA HERDEIROS PASSANHA 1738
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IM, JEAN H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HP QUINTA DE S.VICENTE AZEITE VIRGEM EXTRA HERDEIROS PASSANHA 1738?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ferreira do Alentejo, PT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Burton S. Ehrlich
BURTON S EHRLICH LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S MICHIGAN AVESTE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604-2508Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Olive oils for food; preserved olives; preserved vegetables; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; edible oils and fats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 12, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 12, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 6, 2014 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |