USPTO serial 85358982
COMPETENCE : INTEGRITY : ACCOUNTABILITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4403799Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 17, 2013
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COMPETENCE : INTEGRITY : ACCOUNTABILITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Falls Church, VA
Falls Church, VA
Falls Church, VA
TECHNOLOGY, AUTOMATION & MANAGEMENT, INC.
FALLS CHURCH, VA
Other trademarks owned by TECHNOLOGY, AUTOMATION & MANAGEMENT, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott Dondershine
Scott Dondershine DAVID, BRODY & DONDERSHINE, LLP2100 Reston Parkway, Suite 370Reston, VA 20191UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Logistic management services in the fields of computers and computer products; business acquisitions; procurement, namely, purchasing software for others; management of telephone call centers for others; business consulting services in the field of information assurance; software cost assessment services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 15, 2011 |
| 041 | Training in the field of information technology systems, methods, concepts, processes and procedures, namely, information technology systems application management, development, deployment and sustainment, via interactive online training, online training, distance learning instruction and classroom instruction, using online simulations, interactive practice and testing; course monitoring, namely, online student progress tracking | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 15, 2011 |
| 042 | Consulting services in the fields of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; computer software development; analyzing technology requirements and developing recommendations for computer software and systems and other technology needed to meet those requirements, in the field of national security, and health care; custom computer software development; management of wireless networks of others; computer systems integration services; systems and software engineering, namely, systems engineering of information technology systems; design and development of computer software in the nature of metrics solutions; quality management services, namely, quality assurance in the field of computer software and information assurance; computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of the electronic messaging systems and the information technology systems (IT) of others; implementation of Content Management System (CMS) software systems, and implementation of computer technologies, namely, website portals, for others; testing, analysis and evaluation of computer hardware and software to assure compliance with section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act; website usability testing; technical consulting services in the field of healthcare information technology, through integrated clinical and technical services; development of health care technology computer software, namely, clinical software selection, implementation, and technical support services, namely, trouble shooting of computer software problems of others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 15, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Team Consumer Products
- Other trademarks owned by Team Consumer Products, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Team Consumer Products, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by TECHNOLOGY, AUTOMATION & MANAGEMENT, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named COMPETENCE : INTEGRITY : ACCOUNTABILITY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 13, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2013 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 2, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 11, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 7, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 29, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |