Drawing for POWERCEMS

USPTO serial 85359647

POWERCEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWERCEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jerald L. Meyer

Jerald L. Meyer The Nath Law Group112 S. West StreetAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Transmissometers; Opacity monitors; Scattered light meters; Spectrometers; Photometers; Dust monitors based on transmission light, scatter light, or combinations of transmission light and scatter light; Flame ionization detectors; Gas analyzers for laboratory and industrial purposes; Analyzers for analyzing hydrocarbons; Liquid analyzers and water analyzers; Gas and liquid leak detectors for detection of leaks in gas and liquid pipelines; Oxygen sensors for laboratory and industrial purposes; Computer operating system programs for measuring and control technologyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 2, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 31, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 30, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 26, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 26, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 24, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 22, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 22, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 22, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 28, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 27, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 24, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 24, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 29, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Oct 28, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 25, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 1, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 1, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 31, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 29, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 29, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 29, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 2, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 7, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 2, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 25, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 13, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 24, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2012CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 23, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 20, 2011CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 20, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 20, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 17, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2011WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Sep 21, 2011WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 7, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance