Drawing for S&P RISK CONTROL INDICES

USPTO serial 85360051

S&P RISK CONTROL INDICES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with S&P RISK CONTROL INDICES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dolores F. DiBella

DOLORES F. DIBELLA PROSKAUER ROSE LLP11 TIMES SQNEW YORK, NY 10036-6581UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Publications and printed matter, namely, books, magazines, newsletters, and journals relating to finance, business and investmentsACTIVE—
035Providing a financial index consisting of stocks that reflect the performance of markets the index measures; providing financial indices in the nature of quantitative measurements for analyzing markets; providing financial indices based on selected groups of securitiesACTIVE—
036Providing financial and investment information services, namely, calculating financial indexes; financial analysis and research services; providing information on financial indexes and investment concepts; providing financial and investment services, namely, financial information based on different asset class indicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 18, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 17, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 22, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 22, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 17, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 27, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 27, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2011GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 26, 2011GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 26, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 21, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 7, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance