USPTO serial 85360313
KEY LARGO CHOCOLATES TASTE OF THE KEYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KEY LARGO CHOCOLATES TASTE OF THE KEYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank L. Kubler
Frank L. Kubler Oltman, Flynn & Kubler915 Middle River Drive, Suite 403Galleria Professional Building,Fort Lauderdale, FL 33304Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Chocolate; Chocolate and chocolates; Chocolate bark containing ground coffee beans; Chocolate bars; Chocolate based ingredient for use in confectionery products; Chocolate candies; Chocolate chips; Chocolate confections; Chocolate confections, namely, chocolate based wrapper with fillings; Chocolate covered cocoa nibs; Chocolate covered cookies; Chocolate covered fruit; Chocolate covered nuts; Chocolate covered popcorn; Chocolate covered pretzels; Chocolate covered raisins; Chocolate covered roasted coffee beans; Chocolate fondue; Chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based; Chocolate for confectionery and bread; Chocolate for toppings; Chocolate mousse; Chocolate pastes; Chocolate topped pretzels; Chocolate topping; Chocolate truffles; Chocolate-based fillings for cakes and pies; Chocolate-covered potato chips; Chocolates and chocolate based ready to eat candies and snacks; Confectioneries, namely, snack foods, namely, chocolate; Filled chocolate; Fresh fruits cut into flower shapes and at least partially coated with chocolate; Grain-based food bars also containing dried fruit, chocolate, nuts; Hot chocolate; Milk chocolate; Snack foods, namely, chocolate-based snack foods; Spread containing chocolate and nuts | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Taste of the Keys
- Other trademarks owned by Thomas, Robert F
- Other trademarks owned by Taste of the Keys
- Other trademarks owned by Thomas, Robert F
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named KEY LARGO CHOCOLATES TASTE OF THE KEYS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | GNR1 | NOTIFICATION OF DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | GNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2011 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 4, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |