USPTO serial 85360424
ORGANICLIVES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ORGANICLIVES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter MacPherson
PETER MACPHERSON FARRIS, VAUGHAN, WILLS & MURPHY LLP1708 DOLPHIN AVENUESUITE 800KELOWNA, BC, V1Y9S4Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Organic foods, namely, fruits and berries, vegetables, spices and seasonings and nuts and seeds; prepared organic foods; instructional cooking books, DVDs and other video formats; promotional materials, namely, posters and information cards | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2010 |
| 035 | Internet-based services specializing in organic whole and functional foods, equipment for the preparation of foods and instructional cooking books and video materials; the sale and distribution of organic whole and functional foods; disseminating information to the public regarding healthy living, nutrition and organic food, by the Internet, books and printed publications, posters and information cards; the operation and hosting of an interactive Internet website relating to healthy living, food and nutrition | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Apr 1, 2010 |
| 041 | Superfoods, functional foods, coconut water; retail and in-store restaurant services specializing in organic whole and functional foods; educational workshops providing instruction on the preparation of organic foods, health foods and natural foods | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2011 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |