Drawing for DRUG DELIVERY ENGINE

USPTO serial 85360467

DRUG DELIVERY ENGINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DRUG DELIVERY ENGINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Erik M. Pelton

ERIK M PELTON ERIK M PELTON & ASSOCIATES PLLCPO BOX 100637ARLINGTON, VA 22210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Drug delivery systems, namely, tablets, capsules, and pellets that provide controlled timed release and/or targeted release of the active ingredients of a wide variety of pharmaceutical preparations for humans; drug delivery systems, namely, oral solid dose tablets or capsules that provide controlled timed release and/or targeted release of the active ingredients of a wide variety of pharmaceutical preparations for humans; pharmaceutical preparations, namely, tablets, capsules, and pellets for humans that provide controlled timed release and/or targeted release of the active ingredients of pharmaceutical preparations, all sold as an integral component of pharmaceutical preparations for use in the treatment of attention deficit disorders, central nervous system disorders, depression, diabetes, epilepsy, gastric disorders, gastro-intestinal tract disorders, hypertension, infection, inflammation, pain, rheumatoid arthritis and rhinitisACTIVE—
042Research and development services for others in the pharmaceutical sciences, namely, the development and application of drug delivery technologies in the field of controlled, timed release and/or targeted release pharmaceutical preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 22, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 22, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 29, 2015EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 30, 2015RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Jan 30, 2015RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Jan 9, 2015GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2015GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2015CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 13, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 10, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 10, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 15, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 15, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 15, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 19, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 12, 2014ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2014GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2014GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2014CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 2, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 26, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 5, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 6, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 3, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 11, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 11, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 23, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 4, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance