Drawing for IKNIGHTS

USPTO serial 85361124

IKNIGHTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IKNIGHTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Harold Milstein

Harold Milstein Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP379 Lytton AvenuePalo Alto, CA 94301-1479UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable video game software for use on wireless devices; computer game software downloadable from a global computer networkACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable video games; entertainment services, namely, providing online, non-downloadable virtual missions, weapons, heroes, legions, troops, gifts, and prizes, for use in virtual environments created for entertainment purposes; providing an internet website portal in the field of computer games and gaming; entertainment services, namely, providing virtual environments in which users can interact through social games for recreational, leisure, or entertainment purposesACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, creating an online community for registered users to participate in competitions, showcase their skills, get feedback from their peers, form virtual communities, engage in social networking, and improve their talent; providing a website featuring non-downloadable software tools for use in tracking performance of computer gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 8, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 8, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 20, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 4, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 10, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 7, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 21, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 26, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2011COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 12, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 4, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance