USPTO serial 85362089
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael B. Chesal
MICHAEL B CHESAL PERETZ CHESAL & HERRMANN PL201 S BISCAYNE BLVDSUITE 1750MIAMI, FL 33131-4329| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Teas not for medicinal purposes | ABANDONED | Dec 28, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 1, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 1, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |