USPTO serial 85362225
CMGC INSTITUTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 10, 2012
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CMGC INSTITUTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wilford A. Beesley III
WILFORD A. BEESLEY III PRINCE YEATES & GELDZAHLER175 E 400 S STE 900SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-2357UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting courses and interactive learning seminars in the fields of Construction Management General Contractor (CMGC) techniques and concepts, namely, providing certification, and credentials to transportation professionals concerning CMGC contracting, engineering and construction | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 29, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 3, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 20, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 20, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |