USPTO serial 85362447
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
New York, NY
San Mateo, CA
San Mateo, CA
San Mateo, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann Lamport Hammitte
Ann Lamport Hammitte LANDO & ANASTASI, LLP60 State Street, 23rd FloorBoston, MA 02109UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Outsourcing services; business management and consultation services; business consultation in the fields of online retail sales and comparison shopping websites; business management consultation in the field of sales leads, sales, and sale conversions; business consultation and management regarding listing of products via a single data feed on online shopping websites; business management services, namely, identifying for others the correct category and sub-category for listing products on online shopping search engines; business monitoring services, namely, tracking and analyzing the performance of a comparison shopping marketing program against other marketing channels of trade; business monitoring, namely, tracking the web sites of others to provide details about user click traffic, sales leads, product orders, business revenue, sales conversions, business costs, and advertising expenditures that result from online comparison shopping channels of trade | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 20, 2006 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) featuring software for online retailers to submit, manage, and optimize product listings on shopping websites through a single data feed; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software to analyze and validate product data feed, make automated corrections via data feed rules, identify data feed errors, suggest data feed optimization corrections, and categorize products for individual shopping engines; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software to create shopping engine specific data feeds; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software to transform and update a single data feed into multiple feeds formatted for specific shopping engines; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software to identify the correct category and sub-category of each product listed in a data feed for individual shopping engines; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software to submit fresh data feeds daily for individual products to shopping engines; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for online retailers to track and analyze the performance of a comparison shopping program against other marketing channels; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software to track and analyze user click traffic, sales leads, product orders, revenue, sales conversions, costs and return on advertising expenditures that results from comparison shopping channels; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems and computer software as a service (SAAS) problems; computer services, namely, analyzing and validating computer data feeds comprised of product information, identifying and correcting computer data feed errors, and designing and developing computer data feed corrections for optimization of listings on individual online shopping search engines; computer services, namely, computer programming of data feeds for uploading on online shopping search engines; computer services, namely, programming and updating single computer data feeds into multiple computer data feeds that are formatted for specific online shopping search engines; computer services, namely, daily uploading of fresh data feeds comprised of product information to online shopping search engines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 20, 2006 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 24, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 5, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |