USPTO serial 85364007
C CONNECTED PANEL ENABLED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with C CONNECTED PANEL ENABLED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
I. EDWARD MARQUETTE
I. EDWARD MARQUETTE KUTAK ROCK, LLP2300 MAIN STREETSUITE 800KANSAS CITY, MO 64108Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic interfaces and gateways, namely, telecommunications and aircraft-based data networking hardware and software for use in data networking; computer networking products, namely, computer programs for use in networking computers, computer application software for networking computers, operating software, and hardware, namely, hubs, switches, routers, servers, and wireless, local area network, Ethernet, and universal serial bus access points; communication software and hardware for providing interactive and interoperable communications between either of equipment certified for airworthiness by applicable governmental regulatory bodies and other aircraft instrumentation and equipment, namely, intercoms, transceivers, thermometers, and radios, safety and warning instrumentation and equipment, namely, radar, transponders, traffic alert and collision avoidance systems (TCAS), ground-proximity warning systems (GPWS), Arinc 708, failure enunciators, and lightning detectors, flight control and monitoring instrumentation and devices, namely, altimeters, GPS units, wide area augmentation systems (WAAS), glide scopes, gyroscopes, pitch and yaw indicators, and airspeed indicators, and engine and power control devices and instrumentation, namely, tachometers, oil and fuel gauges, and manifold pressure gauges, and either of portable computing devices such as personal digital assistants, mobile phones, smart phones, touch screen computing devices, tablet computers, laptop computers, netbook computers, and personal computers and hardware and software for providing access to the internet; communication software and hardware for providing interactive and interoperable communications between portable computing devices such as personal digital assistants, mobile phones, smart phones, touch screen computing devices, tablet computers, laptop computers, netbook computers, and personal computers and hardware and software for providing access to the internet; communication software and hardware providing the ability to connect to and disconnect from a number of different computer networks and aviation and avionics equipment and instrumentation without a user visible reconfiguration; computer programs for providing adaptive displays using various techniques in portable computing devices such as personal digital assistants, mobile phones, smart phones, touch screen computing devices, tablet computers, laptop computers, netbook computers, and personal computers; computer hardware and software for encryption and decryption of digital files, including audio, video, text, binary, still images, graphics and multimedia files; computer software in the nature of a dynamic distributed computing infrastructure used to build and develop flight-related applications used over the Internet and on portable computing devices such as personal digital assistants, mobile phones, smart phones, touch screen computing devices, tablet computers, laptop computers, netbook computers, and personal computers; computer software for use in providing a computing environment in which development of computer applications is fostered, all in the nature of software for development of other computer programs for all aspects of flight-related activities, including before, during, after, and between flights, namely, computer software for use in checking weather, finalizing routes, finalizing flight plans, filing and obtaining clearances, preparing flight-related charts, preparing flight databases, destination and logistics planning, notifying others of upcoming flights, confirming pilot and aircraft airworthiness, confirming aircraft availability, planning for passenger comfort, loading flight plans, loading flight clearance information, tuning radios, providing chart and flight database management, monitoring fuel status and consumption, monitoring engine condition and performance, avoiding turbulence, lightning, and inclement weather, avoiding flight obstacles such as towers, mountains, and other tall structures, checklist execution, position reporting and tracking, communicating with people on the ground, keeping passengers comfortable, monitoring and regulating environmental systems, closing flight plans, facilitating flight log data entry and verification, arrival notifications, arranging ground transport, providing flight reviews and debriefings, incident reporting, providing flight trend reviews, sharing flight experience, data analysis, maintaining aircraft, facilitating pilot training, maintaining pilot status | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 14, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 13, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 4, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 30, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 21, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 17, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 8, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 13, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |