Drawing for MISSION ESSENTIALS

USPTO serial 85364052

MISSION ESSENTIALS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAKER, JORDAN A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MISSION ESSENTIALS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

B. Craig Killough

B CRAIG KILLOUGH BARNWELL WHALEY PATTERSON & HELMSPO DRAWER H288 MEETING STREET SUITE 200CHARLESTON, SC 29401

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Bar soap; Body wash; Face and body lotions; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Moisturizing creams; Shave creams; Skin lotions; Skin moisturizer; Sun screenACTIVEJan 31, 2008
005Insect repellentsACTIVEMar 31, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 25, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 25, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 16, 2016EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 2, 2016RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Jan 14, 2016GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2016GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2016CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 23, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 20, 2015GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2015GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2015CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 18, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 18, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 24, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 17, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 16, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2015RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Apr 28, 2015RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2015RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Apr 15, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 17, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 17, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 3, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 13, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 5, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 20, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 20, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 5, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 30, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 27, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 23, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 6, 2011EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jul 12, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance