Drawing for DIVORCEPARTY.COM

USPTO serial 85364192

DIVORCEPARTY.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HINES, REGINA C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIVORCEPARTY.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Allen Unger

Allen Unger Bobby Goldstein Productions, Inc.4516 LOVERS LANE#104Dallas, TX 75225-6925

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Online retail store services featuring clothing and novelty merchandise related to the subject of divorce and/or celebrity divorceACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring photographic, audio, video and prose presentations of news, information, goods and services related to the subject of divorceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 9, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 1, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 1, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 18, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 30, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 26, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 26, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 15, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 5, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 4, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 6, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 18, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 11, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 11, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 8, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 30, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 27, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 26, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 26, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 24, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 16, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 12, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2011TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Jul 11, 2011PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance