USPTO serial 85364637
THUMBLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4432942Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 12, 2013
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THUMBLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Canfield
David J. Canfield Canfield Madden & Ruggiero LLP1461 Franklin AvenueGarden City, NY 11530UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Frignani, Davide
- Other trademarks owned by Frignani, Davide
- Other trademarks owned by STILOTECH INC.
- Other trademarks owned by STILOTECH INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named THUMBLE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 8, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2013 | RDX2 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 2013 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2012 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2012 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 16, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 10, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 13, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |