Drawing for K-Y BRAND DATE NIGHT

USPTO serial 85364893

K-Y BRAND DATE NIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with K-Y BRAND DATE NIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jake D. Feldman

JAKE D. FELDMAN JOHNSON & JOHNSON1 JOHNSON & JOHNSON PLZNEW BRUNSWICK, NJ 08933-7001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated massage oils; flavored massage preparations, namely, oils; edible massage preparations, namely oilsACTIVE—
005Personal lubricantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 17, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 17, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 10, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 7, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 7, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 7, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 16, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 5, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 16, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 16, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 14, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 19, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 30, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 14, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 10, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 25, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 23, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 20, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2011CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 1, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 25, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance