USPTO serial 85364961
ULTRA ROMANTICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUSTASON, ANNE C
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ULTRA ROMANTICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
West Palm Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher M. Taylor
Christopher M. Taylor Hooper Hathaway, P.C.126 South Main StreetAnn Arbor, MI 48104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Television advertising services for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Broadcasting services in the nature of transmission of ongoing programs distributed via broadcast television, cable television, satellite, wireless, internet, mobile device networks, and broadband | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing on-ongoing television programs distributed via broadcast television, cable television, satellite, wireless, internet, mobile device networks and broadband | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |