Drawing for BIDDROCKET

USPTO serial 85364994

BIDDROCKET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIDDROCKET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Blake Simpson Fricks

BLAKE SIMPSON FRICKS SMITH ANDERSON BLOUNTPO BOX 2611RALEIGH, NC 27602-2611UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035providing on-line event registration services for social events, concerts, fundraisers, sports tournaments and special events, and providing promotional activities for those events in the nature of on-line advertisementsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 22, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 27, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 19, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 19, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 24, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 23, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 20, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 20, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 8, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 31, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 31, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 27, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 26, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 26, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 26, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 24, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 20, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 20, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 25, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 23, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 14, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 25, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 24, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 30, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 30, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 2, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 14, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 13, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance