Drawing for CROWDTHINKING & CROWDFUNDING EDUCATION

USPTO serial 85365140

CROWDTHINKING & CROWDFUNDING EDUCATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CROWDTHINKING & CROWDFUNDING EDUCATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Warren L. Dranit

WARREN L. DRANIT SPAULDING MCCULLOUGH & TANSIL LLPPO BOX 1867SANTA ROSA, CA 95402-1867UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Online fundraising services namely providing the opportunity and means to make monetary donations to an organization and information on the purpose, future plans and monetary needs of charitable organizationsACTIVE—
041Providing a website featuring non-downloadable video content about issues in education and which website features links to a mechanism for organizations to raise money for projects that solve these issues; providing information about education and non-downloadable video content about educationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2012MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 16, 2012ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 15, 2012EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 19, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 19, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 19, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 28, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 12, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance