USPTO serial 85365463
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Charlottesville, VA
Charlottesville, VA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore A. Breiner
THEODORE A. BREINER BREINER & BREINER, L.L.C.115 NORTH HENRY STREETALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2903UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 27, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 1, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |