Drawing for MESOPRO

USPTO serial 85365850

MESOPRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MESOPRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nathan W. Johnson

Kate Margolis BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP1600 Division Street, Suite 700Nashville, TN 37203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Statistical analysis and reporting services for business purposes in the nature of data collection, aggregation, statistical analysis, and providing reportable data relating to agriculture, soil, and cropsACTIVE—
042Agricultural research services in the nature of data collection and aggregation, statistical analysis, and providing analytical relating to soil and crops; Providing a secured-access website featuring technology that enables users to view, analyze manipulate and report data and information regarding agriculture and agronomic factors; Providing a secured-access website featuring non-downloadable software through which data and information on agricultural and agronomic factors can be viewed, manipulated, analyzed and reported for purposes of farmingACTIVE—
044Agricultural advice in the nature of providing recommendations relating to agriculture, soil and cropsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 15, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 15, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 30, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 21, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 10, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 10, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 23, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 14, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 14, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 20, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 12, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 12, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 14, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 19, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 30, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 11, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 9, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 23, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 23, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 10, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 26, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance