Drawing for NONSPIL

USPTO serial 85366190

NONSPIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, LESLIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NONSPIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marcia A. Auberger

MARK B HARRISON VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005A house mark for a full line of pharmaceutical preparations including preparations for the treatment of fever, pain, cough, allergies, and congestionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 27, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 27, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 13, 2013EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 17, 2012GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2012GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2012CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 1, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 1, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 1, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 1, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 1, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 1, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 27, 2012ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 6, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 14, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 13, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance