USPTO serial 85366381
SHAAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HELFMAN, JUDITH MICHELLE
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHAAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven Ling
Steven Ling JOSEPH WORLDWIDE COUNSELSP.O. Box 7-1023Taipei City, 10699TAIWANGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Shampoos; conditioners; non-medicated hair treatments; hair styling lotions; hair sprays; hair gels; hair styling mousses; hair perming preparations; cosmetic preparations for hair and scalp; hair creams; hair care creams; hair care lotions; hair fixers; hair emollients; hair nourishers; hair tonics; hair straightening preparations; hair styling preparations; hair oils; hair relaxers; hair waxes; hair colorants and hair dyes; soaps; beauty masks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2013 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| May 9, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 27, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 2, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 1, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |