USPTO serial 85366425
MONTE CARLO WORLD'S MOST PRESTIGIOUS VODKA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAGHANI, MAYUR C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MONTE CARLO WORLD'S MOST PRESTIGIOUS VODKA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerry D. Haynes
JERRY D HAYNES LAW OFFICE OF JERRY D HAYNES PA12550 BISCAYNE BLVD STE 800MIAMI, FL 33181-2545UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Vodka | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2017 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 17, 2016 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 18, 2016 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |