Drawing for BITJACKET

USPTO serial 85366452

BITJACKET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BITJACKET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan W. Gorman

SUSAN W. GORMAN BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH AND BIRCH, LLPPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely, software development tools for the creation of mobile internet applications and client interfacesACTIVE—
035Dissemination of advertising for others via public and private wireless networks for display on mobile devices; Advertising and marketing services provided by means of indirect methods of marketing communications, namely, social media, search engine marketing, internet marketing, mobile marketing, blogging and other forms of passive, sharable or viral communications channelsACTIVE—
042Computer software development in the field of mobile applications; Computer services, namely, search engine optimization; Consulting services in the field of search engine optimization; Computer services, namely, mobile website optimizationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 29, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 25, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 31, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 27, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 8, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 8, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 3, 2011GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 3, 2011GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 3, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 27, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 14, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance