USPTO serial 85367297
STAYS COLD AND DELICIOUS WITH MAGIC ICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STAYS COLD AND DELICIOUS WITH MAGIC ICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sherman Oaks, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverage produced from a brewed malt base with natural flavors; Alcoholic beverages containing fruit; Alcoholic beverages except beers; Alcoholic beverages of fruit; Alcoholic beverages, namely, digestifs; Alcoholic beverages, namely, flavor-infused whiskey; Alcoholic beverages, namely, Ready to Drink beverages; Alcoholic carbonated beverages, except beer; Alcoholic coffee-based beverage; Alcoholic mixed beverages except beers; Alcoholic tea-based beverage; Flavored brewed malt beverage; Liquor and liqueur beverages, namely, Ready to Drink beverages; Rum; Spirits; Wine-based beverage, namely, piquette | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2013 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | TPDD | TEAS DUE DILIGENCE PETITION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |