Drawing for UNIVERSITYNOW

USPTO serial 85367490

UNIVERSITYNOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNIVERSITYNOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raj Abhyanker

Raj Abhyanker LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C.446 E Southern AveTempe, AZ 85282UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable educational computer software for students featuring a wide variety of university, graduate, and post-graduate level academic subjects; downloadable computer software for generating online courses of instruction, particularly for management and administration of online courses of instruction, bulletin boards, chat rooms and database resources and searching, browsing, indexing, filtering and retrieval of data and content of computers, computer networks and the internet, and management of administrative and community functions for university and corporate environmentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 19, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 15, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 15, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 31, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 29, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 29, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 8, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 6, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 23, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 17, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 9, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 22, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 22, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 22, 2012IIOAINADVERTENTLY ISSUED OFFICE ACTION—
Feb 22, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 22, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 22, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 31, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 31, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 31, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 14, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance