USPTO serial 85368135
ENSURING A HEARING FUTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HENRY, NAKIA D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENSURING A HEARING FUTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter J. Karol
PETER J. KAROL SUNSTEIN KANN MURPHY & TIMBERS LLP125 SUMMER STBOSTON, MA 02110-1616UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Microprocessors; audio processors for hearing aids and hearing implants, namely, processors providing electrical stimulation signals based on sensed acoustic or electric signals; microprocessors to control hearing implants; speech processors in the nature of processors providing electrical stimulation signals based on sensed acoustic or electric signals for cochlear implants, middle ear implants, skull mounted hearing implants and auditory brainstem implants; computer software for control and adjustment of implants and speech processors; audio and visual training software for use in training on the use of speech processors; computer programs for data processing; data carriers containing information for surgical and audiological training; data carriers containing tests for the recording and assessment of speech comprehension and quality | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Hearing aids; hearing prostheses; parts for hearing aids and hearing prostheses; surgical implants comprising artificial material; hearing implants, namely, cochlear implants, middle ear implants, skull mounted hearing implants and auditory brainstem implants; electrodes for medical purposes; implant electrodes for medical use; hearing aids; bone conducting hearing systems comprised of a surgically implanted electronic device which creates an output signal and is coupled to the human skull; partially and fully implantable hearing aids; surgical apparatus and instruments for use in hearing implant surgery | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed books, journals, catalogs, guidebooks, training materials, testing and evaluation materials and newsletters in the field of education and training in hearing and speech development and auditory rehabilitation | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing medical training in the field of surgery, auditory rehabilitation, and hearing and speech development and therapy | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Providing a website featuring information on hearing aids, cochlear implants, middle ear implants, skull mounted hearing implants and auditory brainstem implants; hearing and speech development and therapy and auditory rehabilitation; hearing and speech development and hearing and speech therapy services; auditory rehabilitation services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte Ges.m.b.H.
- Other trademarks owned by MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte Ges.m.b.H.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named ENSURING A HEARING FUTURE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 1, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 23, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 4, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 3, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 7, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 18, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |