USPTO serial 85368148
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ARMORED SHIELD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA
Cable Manufacturing Business, Inc.
Huntington Beach, CA
Other trademarks owned by Cable Manufacturing Business, Inc.
ARMORED SHIELD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA
ARMORED SHIELD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yuval H. Marcus
Yuval H. Marcus Leason Ellis, LLP1 Barker Avenue, Fifth FloorWhite Plains, NY 10601UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Cable clamps of metal; Cable junction sleeves of metal, all incorporating environmentally-friendly technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 11, 2011 |
| 009 | Cables and fibres for the transmission of sounds and images; Cables for electrical or optical signal transmission; Communications software for connecting secure network users; Computer cables; Computer hardware and software for setting up and configuring local area networks; Computer hardware and software for setting up and configuring wide area networks; Computer hardware for communicating audio, video and data between computers via a global computer network, wide-area computer networks, and peer-to-peer computer networks; Computer network interface devices; Computer networking hardware; Computer software and hardware for secure network users, namely, tamper detection hardware and software to monitor and detect tampering with the hardware and security intrusions; Computer software and hardware for secure network users; Computer software for administration of computer local area networks; Computer software for administration of computer networks; Computers for network management; Electrical and optical cables; Electronic and optical communications instruments and components, namely, optical data links; Fiber optic cables; Fiber optics; Fibre optic couplings; Fibre-optic cables; LAN (local area network) access points for connecting network computer users; LAN (local area network) hardware; LAN (local area network) operating software; Metal cabinets specially adapted to protect telecommunications equipment in the nature of fiber optic cables; Optical cables; Optical communications systems comprised of optical and electronic hardware and computer software for the transmission of data between two points; Optical fiber cables; Optical fibers; Optical fibers sold as a component of fiber optical cables; Optical fibres; Optical fibres, telephone receivers, switchboards, telephone and telegraph wires, video telephones; Protective sheaths for fiber optical cables; Telecommunication cables; Telecommunications and data networking hardware, namely, devices for transporting and aggregating voice, data, and video communications across multiple network infrastructures and communications protocols; WAN (wide area network) hardware, all incorporating environmentally-friendly technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 11, 2011 |
| 038 | Communication via fibre optical networks; Communication via fibre-optic networks; Communication via optical fibre networks; Communications via fiber-optic networks; Communications via fibre-optic networks; Telecommunication services, namely, local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics and video by means of broadband optical or wireless networks; Telecommunication services, namely, local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics and video by means of broadband, copper and optical or wireless networks; Telecommunication services, namely, providing internet access via broadband optical or wireless networks; Telecommunications services, namely, providing fiber optic network services; Transmission of information on optical telecommunication networks; Transmission of SDI-formatted television and audio signals over fiber optic cables, all incorporating environmentally-friendly technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 11, 2011 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 20, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 16, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 7, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 24, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 30, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |