USPTO serial 85368207
PROFESSIONALS ONLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROFESSIONALS ONLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott A. Daniels
SCOTT A. DANIELS DANIELS PATENT LAW PLLC43 CENTRE STCONCORD, NH 03301-4244UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics and personal eye care products, namely, eye cleansing and moisturizing creams, eye lotions, eye gels, eye toners, beauty serums for use on the eyes, make-up remover, and premoistened cosmetic wipes | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Contact lens cleaning solutions, disinfectants, and wetting solutions; artificial tears; eye drops; eyewashes; vitamins to improve ocular health | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | eyeglasses; contact lenses; opthmalmic lenses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Clarion Medical Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PROFESSIONALS ONLY
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |