USPTO serial 85368403
OPTIMIZEDDR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHINER, MARK W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPTIMIZEDDR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rushcutters Bay NSW, AU
Rushcutters Bay NSW, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew Baum
ANDREW BAUM FOLEY & LARDNER LLP90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-1301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for operating environmental control systems in buildings; electronic computer database in the field of HVAC systems and indoor environmental control systems recorded on computer media; software for reporting, monitoring and analyzing energy costs and green house gas emissions in buildings for purposes of reducing same; software for providing demand response and demand management of energy use, namely, for monitoring and controlling energy usage by HVAC systems; electronic databases recorded on computer media containing operational data for HVAC systems for use in providing demand response and demand management of energy use; computer software for creating, managing and enabling access to a centralized database of consumer feedback on current indoor environment conditions, for monitoring HVAC systems in buildings, for identifying and reporting irregularities in HVAC systems in buildings, for reporting on and managing energy consumption by HVAC systems, and for optimizing the operating efficiencies of HVAC systems in buildings; computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | consulting services in the fields of energy management to improve energy efficiency in connection with demand response and demand management methods of energy use management | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services in the fields of energy measurement to improve energy efficiency through computer optimized delivery of HVAC services for buildings and automated management and reporting on energy costs and energy consumption; consulting services in the fields of computer software and programs for building environmental control systems; design, installation, updating and maintenance of computer software systems; monitoring of events and activities which influence the environment and energy usage within a building for purposes of measuring energy usage; remote monitoring of heating, ventilating, and air conditioning apparatus, namely, monitoring and analyzing the performance of environmental control systems in buildings; recording data for others on optical, digital, and magnetic media for electronic storage, namely, recording data relating to energy consumption and the operation of environmental control systems in buildings; recording data relating to energy consumption and the operation of environmental control systems in buildings, namely, gas, electric, and energy meter data management and analysis; provision of engineering information in the field of energy efficiency as it relates to building energy usage, the performance of HVAC systems and optimizing the efficiency and operations of building environmental control systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BuildingIQ Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by BuildingIQ Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named OPTIMIZEDDR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 19, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 15, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 20, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 16, 2013 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 18, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |