USPTO serial 85368447
VENTANA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FATHY, DOMINIC
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VENTANA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven J. Nataupsky
STEVEN J NATAUPSKY KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN STFL 14IRVINE, CA 92614-8214Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical devices, namely, devices for the treatment of aneurysms | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 13, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |