Drawing for MX.COM

USPTO serial 85368765

MX.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MX.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sabrina C. Stavish

SABRINA C. STAVISH SHERIDAN ROSS P.C.1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202-5145UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing a website featuring the goods and services of other vendors; providing a website at which users can offer goods for sale and buy goods offered by others; providing advertising, marketing and promotional services for healthcare products and services; advertising and marketing services; healthcare management services, namely, providing information in the field of business and management consulting for healthcare providers and related businesses, promoting collaboration within the scientific, research and medical communities to achieve advances in the field of healthcare management; business management and consultation servicesACTIVE—
041on-line journals, namely, blogs featuring healthcare practice management informationACTIVE—
045on-line social networking servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 16, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 24, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 8, 2021XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2021GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2021GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2021CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 27, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 27, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 27, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 25, 2020RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 17, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 13, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 6, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 6, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 6, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 24, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 22, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 16, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 8, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 7, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 2, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 26, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 20, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 17, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 7, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 7, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 1, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 1, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 1, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 30, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 8, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 8, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance