USPTO serial 85368787
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William M. Borchard
WILLIAM M. BORCHARD COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.1133 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6710UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated skin care preparations; body cleansers, body wash, skin toners, beauty serums, skin lotion, cosmetic creams; body care products, namely body lotions, body mists, body creams and body oils; non-medicated lip care preparations and lip gloss; cosmetic tanning preparations; pre-moistened cosmetic wipes; hair care products, namely, shampoos, conditioners and styling preparations; fragrances; room fragrances and cosmetics. Candles. Nutritional energy bars for use as a meal substitute, dietary supplemental drinks. Sunglasses. General purpose bags for carrying yoga equipment. Ceramic tiles. Bath accessories, namely, dispensers for liquid soap, facial and bathroom tissue holders and covers, soap brackets, soap dishes, soap dispensers, manually actuated pump dispenser for attachment to containers for use in dispensing liquids, toothbrush holders, towel bars, towel rings, tumblers, wastebaskets, bath sponges, bath mitts; decorative ceramic tiles not for use as building materials; bowls; makeup and cosmetic organizers; Reusable water bottles sold empty. Towels; bed and table linens; shower curtains. Clothing, namely, tee shirts, tank tops, shorts, sweat pants, sweatshirts, underwear, pajamas, bathrobes, socks, slippers, flip-flops, visors, hair bands, yoga and fitness wear, namely, tee shirts, shorts, yoga pants, tank tops, leggings, sports bras, moisture-wicking sports pants, stretch pants, sports shirts, sweatbands, baseball caps. Bath mats. Yoga accessories, namely, yoga mats and balls. Bottled water; sports and energy drinks. Charitable fundraising services by means of selling goods to raise funds; Health spa services for health and wellness of the body and spirit, namely, providing massage, facial and body treatment services, cosmetic body care services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 17, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |