Drawing for 4G ENABLED LTE

USPTO serial 85368976

4G ENABLED LTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POLZER, NATALIE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 4G ENABLED LTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard W. Hansen

Richard W. Hansen T-Mobile USA, Inc.12920 S.E. 38th StreetBellevue, WA 98006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telecommunication hardware, namely, wireless telephones, batteries, chargers for batteries, hands-free devices for mobile phones and devices and wireless handheld communication devices to transmit, receive or otherwise access communications networks, for use in wireless telephony and in the provision of wireless broadband communication services for the transmission of voice, video, images, data and information; computer application software for mobile phones, namely, operating system software and software for accessing, managing and using wireless broadband service, software for downloading, managing and using applications, music, video, ringtones, images, text and data, backup software, game software, navigation software and software for mobile commerceACTIVE—
038Telecommunications services, namely, wireless telephony and wireless broadband communications services for the transmission of voice, video, images, data and information; streaming of digital media content for others via computer networks; providing e-mail servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 7, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 5, 2016EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 5, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 5, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 7, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 5, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 5, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 12, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 8, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 8, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 8, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 7, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 4, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 4, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 27, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 24, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 24, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 2, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 2, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 2, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 2, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 17, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 28, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 7, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 18, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2013GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jun 5, 2013GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jun 5, 2013CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
May 17, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 13, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 8, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 13, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 25, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 23, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 23, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 23, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 2, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 1, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2011MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jul 16, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance