Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 85369587?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/85369587. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns SUPERCOOLER?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 85369587, the listed owner(s) include: Shuntich, Douglas John.

What is USPTO serial number 85369587?

Serial number 85369587 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark SUPERCOOLER. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover SUPERCOOLER?

The public record lists International Classes: 011. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 85369587

SUPERCOOLER

Q: What is the current status of SUPERCOOLER?

SUPERCOOLER (85369587) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Jul 12, 2011
Status date: Oct 21, 2013
Registration date: —
Examiner: TIERNEY, MARGERY
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPERCOOLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Shuntich, Douglas John
Charlotte, NC
Other trademarks owned by Shuntich, Douglas John

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Luke Brean

LUKE BREAN BREANLAW LLCPO BOX 4120ECM #72065PORTLAND, OR 97208

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
011	Countertop and portable, household refrigerator/freezer capable of storing items in the full temperature range "in-between" standard freezer temperatures and standard refrigeration temperatures between 0 - 40 degrees F (-18 to +4 deg. C), excluding freestanding and built-in household refrigerators, freezers and refrigerated wine cabinets	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Oct 21, 2013	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Oct 21, 2013	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Oct 21, 2013	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Aug 5, 2013	EXPA	EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED	—
May 2, 2013	GNSN	NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
May 2, 2013	GNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
May 2, 2013	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED	—
Mar 11, 2013	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jan 9, 2013	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Jan 9, 2013	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Jan 9, 2013	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Jan 9, 2013	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jan 9, 2013	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 8, 2013	PARI	TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED	—
Dec 4, 2012	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Dec 4, 2012	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Dec 3, 2012	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Nov 27, 2012	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Nov 27, 2012	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Nov 27, 2012	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Nov 27, 2012	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
May 30, 2012	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
May 30, 2012	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 30, 2012	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 8, 2012	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
May 7, 2012	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 7, 2012	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2011	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2011	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2011	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2011	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2011	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2011	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2011	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jul 19, 2011	MPMK	NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED	—
Jul 18, 2011	NWOS	NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED	—