USPTO serial 85370533
AGRITECTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AGRITECTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael O. Scheinberg
MICHAEL O. SCHEINBERG SCHEINBERG & GRINER, LLPPO BOX 164140AUSTIN, TX 78716-4140UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Architectural design services to those who seek to provide sustainable and enhanced agricultural life in the country; Consulting in the field of architectural design to those who seek to provide sustainable and enhanced agricultural life in the country | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 14, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 1, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 17, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |