Drawing for EXPERTS IN MEDIATION & ARBITRATION WORLDWIDE

USPTO serial 85371821

EXPERTS IN MEDIATION & ARBITRATION WORLDWIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4385647Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 13, 2013
Examiner
PERRY, KIMBERLY B
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with EXPERTS IN MEDIATION & ARBITRATION WORLDWIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amanda Laura Nye

Amanda Laura Nye Neff Law Firm, a Professional Law Corp1600 Rosecrans Ave.Media Center, 4th FlManhattan Beach, CA 90266UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041educational services, namely, conducting seminars, and providing courses of instruction and training regarding practical application in the field of conflict prevention management and settlement, and manuals distributed in connection therewithSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
045alternative dispute resolution and mediation consulting services, namely, designing conflict prevention, management and settlement methods, strategies, and plans for use by othersSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2020C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Nov 5, 2019CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2019COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 5, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2018REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 19, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2015COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jul 20, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 8, 2015ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2013R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jul 11, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 11, 2013CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Jul 11, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 12, 2013AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2013IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jan 11, 2013GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 11, 2013GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 11, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 3, 2013AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 3, 2013IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 2, 2013EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 2012ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 13, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 7, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 7, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 19, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance